Comparison of anesthesia professionals' preferences of delivery method with other health professionals

Engin Erturk 1, Ali Akdogan 1 * , Adem Arslan 2
More Detail
1 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Atatürk State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, In press.
OPEN ACCESS

ABSTRACT

Objective: Work areas and clinical practices have an effect on cesarean rates, which are also high in health professionals. Anestehsia professionals and the health professionals who are far from surgical practices may have different views on delivery methods. In this study, it was aimed to investigate which delivery method between vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery was selected by the anesthesia professionals and the health professionals outside the operating room, and why they selected it.
Material and methods: 137 anesthesia professionals and 151 health professionals who had never worked in the operating room were included in this study. The participants' ages, professions and methods of delivery and reasons were questioned by the survey method.
Results: While 58.3% of all the participants preferred the cesarean delivery method at their first birth, 41.7% preferred vaginal delivery. The preference rates of anesthesia professionals for cesarean delivery (69.9%) were found higher than those of the professionals working outside the operating room (46.6%),(p<0.05). As the reason of preference for cesarean delivery, the option of “not putting the baby at risk” is higher among anesthesia professionals than the professionals outside the operating room (p<0.05). As the reason of vaginal delivery, “more physiological”, “fear of anesthesia and surgery”, “early recovery and desire to breastfeed baby” higher compared to anesthesia professionals (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Knowing, practicing and seeing the anesthesia and surgical procedures every day have given the idea that these practices are simple, comfortable and have low risks, so the cesarean delivery rate has increased in anesthesia professionals.

CITATION

Erturk E, Akdogan A, Arslan A. Comparison of anesthesia professionals' preferences of delivery method with other health professionals. J Clin Med Kaz. 2021.

REFERENCES

  • Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, Bréart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):541-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24. PMID: 16946213.
  • Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jan;29(1):7-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829. Epub 2011 Aug 10. PMID: 21833896.
  • Tita AT. When is primary cesarean appropriate: maternal and obstetrical indications. Semin Perinatol. 2012 Oct;36(5):324-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.014. PMID: 23009963.
  • Thuillier C, Roy S, Peyronnet V, Quibel T, Nlandu A, Rozenberg P. Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PMID: 29291413.
  • Mahadik K. Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused? J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Dec;69(6):483-489. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01246-y. Epub 2019 Jun 13. PMID: 31844361; PMCID: PMC6889110.
  • Todman D. A history of caesarean section: from ancient world to the modern era. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Oct;47(5):357-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00757.x. PMID: 17877591.
  • Park CS, Yeoum SG, Choi ES. Study of subjectivity in the perception of cesarean birth. Nurs Health Sci. 2005 Mar;7(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00206.x. PMID: 15670000.
  • Radobugh S. Ceserean birth: reducing incidence while improwing outcomes. AWHONN Lifelines . Feb-Mar 1999;3:28-34.
  • Aslam MF, Gilmour K, Fawdry RD. Who wants a caesarean section? A study of women's personal experience of vaginal and caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Jul;23(4):364-6. doi: 10.1080/0144361031000119493. PMID: 12881072.
  • Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, Müller M, Surbek D. Back to "once a caesarean: always a caesarean"? A trend analysis in Switzerland. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):905-910. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4055-4. Epub 2016 Mar 15. PMID: 26980229.
  • Diejomaoh MFE, Al-Jassar W, Bello Z, Karunakaran K, Mohammed A. The Relevance of the Second Cesarean Delivery in the Reduction of Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates. Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(6):555-561. doi: 10.1159/000493362. Epub 2018 Aug 30. PMID: 30165369; PMCID: PMC6422118.
  • Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet. 1996 Feb 24;347(9000):544. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91176-9. PMID: 8596291.
  • World Healt Statistic. Printed in France. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS10
  • OECD (2020), Caesarean sections (indicator). doi: 10.1787/adc3c39f-en (Accessed on 02 June 2020)
  • Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması. Ankara. Available from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2018/rapor/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf
  • Karabel MP, Demirbaş M, İnci MB. Changing Rates of Cesarean Section in Turkey and in the World and Probable Causes. Sakarya Med J2017,7(4):158-163
  • WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  • Guilmoto CZ, Dumont A. Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190526. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0526.
  • Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5. PMID: 30322585.
  • Erturk E, Bostan H, Eroglu A. Epidural analgesia and vaginal delivery in a patient with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Med Princ Pract. 2011;20(6):574-6. doi: 10.1159/000330027. Epub 2011 Oct 4. PMID: 21986019.
  • Gözükara F, Eroğlu K. Factors that effect the choices of primipars on the mode of delivery (Primigravidaların doğum şekline yönelik tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler) Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal. 2008;15:32-46