Comparison of direct low density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement with the Friedewald formula and alternative formulas

Nilgun Isiksacan 1, Cennet Yildiz 2 * , Fatma Nihan Turhan Caglar 2, Murat Koser 3, Pinar Atar 1, Ismail Biyik 4, Dilay Karabulut 1, Mehmet Erturk 5
More Detail
1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Health Sciences, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Department of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Biochemistry, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
4 Department of Cardiology, Usak University, School of Medicine, Education and Research Hospital, Usak, Turkey
5 Cardiology Department, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp. 24-30.
OPEN ACCESS 596 Views 342 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


Aim: Our aim was to compare the direct enzymatic measurement with four formulas which are used in determining the value of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.
Material and methods: A total of 33842 patients’ files were retrospectively reviewed and data was collected. Triglyceride (TG) group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were consisted of TG levels ≤99 mg/dl, 100-199 mg/dl, 200-299 mg/dl, 300-399 mg/dl and ≥ 400 mg/dl, respectively. LDL-Group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were composed of LDL-C≤100 mg/dl, 101-130 mg/dl, 131-160 mg/dl, 160-190 mg/dl and >190 mg/dl, respectively.
Results: All formulas tended to undervalue LDL-C concentrations compared to direct method (p<0.001 for all). The Chen formula had higher degree of correlation compared to other formulas. Acceptable result of Friedewald formula was 53.77%, Chen formula was 62.72%, Hattori formula was 24.72, and Anandaraja formula was 45.98%. Bland-Altman plot results showed disagreement of four formulas with significant proportional and systematic bias compared to direct method. There was no agreement of calculated LDL-C with direct LDL-C when the data was subgrouped according to TG levels. No agreement between direct LDL-C and calculated LDL-C was found. Correlation analysis showed moderate to high level of correlation for Friedewald, Chen, and Hattori calculations, whereas Anandaraja formula showed low to moderate correlation. The Friedewald and Anandaraja formulas mostly misclassified LDL-Group 3 subjects, whereas the Chen and Hattori formulas mostly misclassified LDL-Group 4 subjects.
Conclusion: The Chen formula might be an acceptable alternative of the Friedewald formula and other formulas.


Isiksacan N, Yildiz C, Caglar FNT, Koser M, Atar P, Biyik I, et al. Comparison of direct low density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement with the Friedewald formula and alternative formulas. J CLIN MED KAZ. 2023;20(1):24-30.


  • Bachorik PS. Ross JW. National Education Program recommendations for measurements of low density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurements. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1414-20.
  • Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA. 2013;310(19):2061-8.
  • Anwar M, Khan DA, Khan FA. Comparison of Friedewald formula and modified Friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24:8-12.
  • Marniemi J. Maki J. Maatela J. Jarvisalo J. Impivaara O. Poor applicability of the Friedewald formula in the assessment of serum LDL cholesterol for clinical purposes. Clin Biochem. 1995; 28:285-289.
  • Martin SS. Blaha MJ. Elshazly MB. Brinton EA, Toth PP, McEvoy JW, et al. Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013a;62:732-739.
  • DeLong DM, DeLong ER, Wood PD, Lippel K, Rifkind BM. A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. JAMA. 1986;256:2372-2377.
  • Authors/Task Force Members; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); ESC National Cardiac Societies.2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Societies. Atherosclerosis. 2019;290:140-205.
  • Cordova CM, Schneider CR, Juttel ID, Cordova MM. Comparison of LDL-cholesterol direct measurement with the estimate using the Friedewald formula in a sample of 10,664 patients. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004; 83: 482-7.
  • Timón-Zapata J, Laserna-Mendieta EJ, Pineda- Tenor D, Agudo-Macazaga M, Narros-Cecilia C, Rocha-Bogas MJ, et al. Extreme concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol affect the calculation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Friedewald formula and other proposed formulas. Clin Biochem. 2011; 44: 1451-6.
  • Jun KR, Park H, Chun S, Park H, Min WK. Effects of total cholesterol and triglyceride on the percentage difference between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration measured directly and calculated using the Friedewald formula. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(Supp 3):371-5.
  • Marniemi J, Maki J, Maatela J, Jarvisalo J, Impivaara O. Poor applicability of the Friedewald formula in the assessment of serum LDL cholesterol for clinical purposes. Clin Biochem. 1995;28:285-9.
  • Tighe DA, Ockene IS, Reed G, Nicolosi R. Calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels frequently underestimate directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in patients with serum triglyceride levels or B4.52 mmol/l: an analysis comparing the LipiDirect_ magnetic LDL assay with the Friedewald calculation. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;365:236-42.
  • Bansal E, Kaur N. Does Friedewald Formula Underestimate the Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease? Ind J Clin Biochem. 2014; 29(4):496-500.
  • Hwang YC, Ahn HY, Jeong IK. Optimal range of triglyceride values to estimate serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in Korean adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:1530-1535. PMID: 23255853.
  • Anandaraja S, Narang Ahn KJ, Chung HY. R, Godeswar R, Laksmy R, Talwar KK. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population. Int J Cardiol. 2005;102:117-20.
  • Ephraim RKD, Acheampong E, Swaray SM, Anto EO, Agbodzaykey H, Adoba P, et al. Developing a Modified Low-Density Lipoprotein (M-LDL C) Friedewald's Equation as a Substitute for Direct LDL-C Measure in a Ghanaian Population: A Comparative Study. Lipids. 2018;2018:7078409.
  • Vujovic A, Stevulijevic JK, Spasic S, Bujisic N, Martinovic J, Vujovic M, et al. Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation. Lipids Health Dis. 2010;9:27.
  • Gupta S, Verma M, Singh K. Does LDL-C Estimation Using Anandaraja's Formula Give a Better Agreement with Direct LDL-C Estimation than the Friedewald's Formula? Ind J Clin Biochem. 2012; 27(2):127-133.
  • Kamal AHM, Hossain M, Chowdhury S, Mahmud NU. A comparison of calculated with direct measurement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol level. JCMCTA. 2009;20:19-23.
  • Gasko R. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by the Anandaraja's formula confirmation. Lipids Health Dis. 2006;5: 18.
  • Krishnaveni P, Gowda VM. Assessing the validity of Friedewald's formula and Anandaraja's formula for serum LDL-cholesterol calculation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:BC01-4.
  • Martins J, Olorunju SA, Murray LM, Pillay TS. Comparison of equations for the calculation of LDL-cholesterol in hospitalized patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;444:137-42.
  • Karkhaneh A, Bagherieh M, Sadeghi S, Kheirollahi A. Evaluation of eight formulas for LDL-C estimation in Iranian subjects with different metabolic health statuses. Lipids Health Dis. 2019;18(1):231.
  • Mora S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Comparison of LDL cholesterol concentrations by Friedewald calculation and direct measurement in relation to cardiovascular events in 27,331 women. Clin Chem. 2009;55:888-94.
  • Nauck M, Graziani MS, Bruton D, Cobbaert C, Cole TG, Lefevre F, et al. Analytical and clinical performance of a detergent-based homogeneous LDL-cholesterol assay: a multicenter evaluation. Clin Chem. 2010;46:506-14.
  • Esteban-Salan M, Aguilar-Doreste JA, Arranz-Pena ML, Juve- Cuxart S, Gich-Salarich I, Zapico-Muniz E, et al. Multicentric evaluation of the homogeneous LDL-cholesterol Plus assay: comparison with beta quantification and Friedewald formula. Clin Biochem. 2008;41:1402-9.
  • Miller WG, Myers GL, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann LM, Caudill SP, Dziekonski A, et al. Seven Direct Methods for Measuring HDL and LDL Cholesterol Compared with Ultracentrifugation Reference Measurement Procedures. Clinical Chemistry. 2010; 56(6):977-986.
  • Oliveira MJA, van Deventr HE, Bachmann LM, Warnick GR, Nakajime K, Nakamura M, et al. Evaluation of Four Different Equations for Calculating LDL-C with Eight Different Direct HDL-C Assays. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;423:135-40.