Validation of the Kazakh-language version of the World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire on the quality of life among the elderly population of Aktobe city

Nurgul Abenova 1 * , Akbayan Imanbayeva 1, Bibigul Karimsakova 1, Inkara Essengalyeva 1
More Detail
1 No1 Department of General Medical Practice, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp. 35-43. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11224
OPEN ACCESS 922 Views 685 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Introduction.
In Kazakhstan, as the phenomenon of population aging becomes more and more relevant, an increasing number of researchers in the field of medicine are studying health-related problems that arise at this age. During these studies, many scientists are wondering: how to accurately measure the quality of life of older people? In our country, the most used tools for conducting this assessment are the SF-36 questionnaire, while the widely used worldwide tools WHOQOL-100 and its short version WHOQOL-BREF are rarely evaluated and used in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Kazakh-language version of the World Health Organization's Short Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) in a pilot study.
Material and methods.
The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was subjected to translation procedures according to the instructions of WHOQOL (WHO) and a pilot study was conducted in a group of elderly respondents (>60 years old) living in the city of Aktobe. The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire consists of 26 questions, which are divided into 4 areas (physical health, emotional health, social factors, environment). The reliability and validity of the questionnaire was evaluated with the determination of the Alpha-Cronbach's index, as well as the assessment of the intra-class correlation (ICC). The statistical significance was set at 0.05. The software package SPSS v. 10.0 was used for the analysis.
Results.
The average age of the participants was 67.3±5.03 years, and the overall WHOQOL-BREF score was 76.02 ±11.86. Overall, 60% of the participants were women. The alpha values for each of the spheres and the overall index (> 0.70) and the overall correlation of the elements were satisfactory. The confirmatory analysis of the intra-class correlation showed high ICC values (more than 0.74) for each of the spheres.
Conclusion.
The psychometric properties of the Kazakh version of WHOQOL-BREF were acceptable.

CITATION

Abenova N, Imanbayeva A, Karimsakova B, Essengalyeva I. Validation of the Kazakh-language version of the World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire on the quality of life among the elderly population of Aktobe city. J CLIN MED KAZ. 2021;18(5):35-43. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11224

REFERENCES

  • Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Statistics. Kazakhstan Demographic Yearbook 2019. Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan: Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Statistics. https://stat.gov.kz/edition/publication/collection.
  • Chu CY. Age-distribution dynamics and aging indexes. Demography. 1997; 34(4):551-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3038309
  • The Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan Statistics Committee and UNFPA. Population Situation Analysis ofthe Republic of Kazakhstan. May 2020. https://kazakhstan.unfpa.org/en/topics/population-matters-7.
  • Farzianpour, F., Hosseini, S., Rostami, M., Pordanjani, S. B. & Hosseini, S. M. Quality of Life of the Elderly Residents. Am J of Appl Sci. 2012; 9(1):71-74. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2012.71.74.
  • Nejati V, Shirinbayan P, Akbari A, Foroughan M, Taheri P, Sheikhvatan M. Quality of life in elderly people in Kashan, Iran. Middle East J Age Ageing. 2008; 5(2):21-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242459116
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS-36 item short-form health survey (SF-36) Med Care. 1992; 30(6):473-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  • Mellor D, Russo S, McCabe MP, Davison TE, George K. Depression training program for caregivers of elderly care recipients: implementation and qualitative evaluation. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008; 34(9):8-17. DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20080901-09
  • Gureje O, Ogunniyi A, Kola L, Afolabi E. Functional disability in elderly Nigerians: Results from the Ibadan study of aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54(11):1784-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00944.x
  • Donmez L, Gokkoca Z, Dedeoglu N. Disability, and its effects on quality of life among older people living in Antalya city center. Turkey Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2005; 40(2):213-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.08.006
  • Bussche HV, Koller D, Olonko T, Hansen H, Wegscheide K. et al. Which chronic diseases and disease combinations are specific to multi morbidity in the elderly? Results of claims data based cross-sectional study in Germany. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:101. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-101
  • World Health Organization. Life in the 21st Century: a vision for all. Geneva, 1998. Available from: http:// www.who.int/whr/1998/en/whr98_en.pdf.
  • The World Health Report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance, WHO, 2000. Available from: http:// www. who. int/ whr/2000/en/.
  • Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, Heinrich S, Corrieri S. Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2011; 68:387-420. DOI: 10.1177/1077558711399580
  • G.R. Doszhanova, A.A. Abduldaeva, S.A. Iskakova. Assessment of the quality of life of elderly and senile people of the indigenous population of the city of Astana. Bulletin of KazNMU 2013, №2, p. 51-55. UDC:613.98-005.6(574.24)
  • Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(2):299-310. DOI:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00
  • Burkovski G.V. Use of the WHO quality of life questionnaire in psychiatric practice / G.V. Burkovsky, M.M. Kabanov, A.P. Kotsyubinsky E.V. Levchenko, A.S. Lomachenkov Psychosocial rehabilitation in psychiatry and neurology. Methodological and organizational aspects. – SPb.: –2017. – 600 c/ ISBN 978-5-299-00911-8
  • The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research. 2004; 13(2):299-310. DOI:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00
  • Trompenaars FJ, Masthoff ED, Van Heck GL, Hodiamont PP, De Vries J. Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(1):151-60. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-0787-x
  • Usefy A, Ghassemi GR, Sarrafzadegan N, Mallik S, Baghaei A, Rabiei K. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in an Iranian adult sample. Community Ment Health J. 2010; 46(2):139-147. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-009-9282-8
  • Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986; 35(6):382–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  • Yaser Khaje-Bishak, Laleh Payahoo, , Bahram Pourghasem, and Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi Assessing the Quality of Life in Elderly People and Related Factors in Tabriz, Iran. J Caring Sci. 2014; 3(4):257–263. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.028
  • Ahmadi F, Salar A, Faghihzadeh S. Assessing quality of life among elderly people in Zahedan. Hayat. 2004; 10(22):61–7.
  • Ping Xia,Ningxiu Li,corresponding author Kit-Tai Hau,Chaojie Liu, and Yubo Lu. Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: a psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:37. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-37
  • Mary H. Kalfoss,1 Randi J. Reidunsdatter,2 Christian A. Klöckner,3 and Marianne Nilsen. Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general populationHealth Qual Life Outcomes. 2021; 19:13. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01656-x
  • Robbert JJ Gobbens and Roy Remmen. The effects of sociodemographic factors on quality of life among people aged 50 years or older are not unequivocal: comparing SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF, and WHOQOL-OLD. Clin Interv Aging. 2019; 14:231–239. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S189560
  • Gambin G, Molzahn A, Fuhrmann AC, Morais EP, Paskulin LM. Quality of life of older adults in rural southern Brazil. Rural Remote Health. 2015; 15(3):3300. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH3300
  • Soósová MS. Determinants of quality of life in elderly. Central Euro J Nurs Midwifery. 2016; 7(3):484–493. https://doi. org/10.15452/CEJNM.2016.07.0019
  • Gobbens RJJ, van Assen M. Associations between multidimensional frailty and quality of life among Dutch older people. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017; 73:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.007
  • Gambin G, Molzahn A, Fuhrmann AC, Morais EP, Paskulin LM. Quality of life of older adults in rural southern Brazil. Rural Remote Health. 2015; 15(3):3300. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH3300
  • Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, van Assen MA.Explaining quality of life of older people in the Netherlands using a multidimensional assessment of frailty. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22(8):2051-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0341-1